Building a low-carbon future: the politics of climate change

CC-webfinalWill the reconstruction of the global economy be positive for mitigating climate change? Is the move toward energy security at odds with a low-carbon society? Do we need the return of state planning to overcome the climate change challenge? How can the response to climate change be socially just? How can we forge an achievable but also equitable and legally secure international emissions deal at Copenhagen?

By addressing these questions, leading international thinkers and practitioners put forward a compelling new account of climate change politics and policies in this pamphlet, demonstrating how a low-carbon future can be built by a revitalised co-existence of markets and the state, as well as a strong political narrative of hope and opportunity.

Continue reading

Martin Rees

Martin Rees, President of the Royal Society and Professor of Cosmology and Astrophysics  at the University of Cambridge speaks to Policy Network ahead of his speech on the politics of climate change. He asserts that faith in technology will see us meet 2050 targets, live in a low-carbon society,  and maintain our standard of living and levels of economic growth.

Open letter from Leslie Dighton, LSE governor

Open letter to the organisers and participants of the politics of climate change conference with special reference to the contributions by Tony Blair, Martin Rees, Richard Lambert and David Cote.

Congratulations to the organisers for an unusually well constructed day on an unusually complex issue. What was its conclusion?

The key one got said at the conference – the brutal truth is we are missing the key targets – but it remained in the small print of the main debate. 20 years of serious scientific understanding and three years of intensive public awareness later, there is no decline in the trend of emissions outputs nor even a declaration.

Continue reading

Roger Liddle’s thoughts on a successful conference

Roger Liddle, Vice Chair of Policy Network gives his concluding thoughts on the Policy Network’s conference on ‘The Politics of Climate Change’ on 5th June 2009 at the LSE.

Tony Blair headlines Afternoon Plenary

Part 1

Continue reading

Dave Cote, CEO of Honeywell Speaks at Second Plenary

Video Interview

David Cote, CEO of Honeywell, speaks to Policy Network ahead of his speech in the second plenary.

In his speech Cote discussed climate change-related business trends and Honeywell’s growing role in the European and U.S. energy efficiency markets.

“While adoption and the individual savings contribution of these technologies will differ by region, the overall forecasted energy savings is 15-20% for both the U.S. and Europe,” said Cote.

Cote discussed the impediments and solutions to using energy efficient technologies, including a call for governments worldwide to uncover more ways to curb energy consumption while creating incentives that support energy and economic security.

“Reducing energy intensity while improving energy and economic security is a huge issue,” said Cote. “We won’t get there unless we address the behaviors inherent in the system. It is all very doable, we just have to get started.”

Watch his speech in full here.

Terry Leahy, CEO of Tesco – Interview

Terry Leahy, the CEO of Tesco speaks about incentivizing the consumer to live a low carbon way of life at Policy Network’s ‘Politics of Climate Change’ conference on 5th June 2009 at the LSE. Leahy argues a green way of life begins and ends with the consumer and they must be motivated not just through tax and regulation to change their lifestyle. He believes governments cannot see consumers as a problem by restricting and rationing our lives, rather create frameworks and markets that encourages both businesses and consumers towards a better way of life.

Terry Leahy’s speech on the politics of climate change:

“As we prepare for Copenhagen later this year, we need to confront a brutal truth: our approach to tackling climate change is not working. On current trends, we’re going to miss all the targets we have set ourselves. We’re in this situation because the climate change debate is based on a number of wrong assumptions. One is that climate change can only be solved by big governments and big technology.

Continue reading